Cases
Note: These cases are not in date order
Paul Ronald - Malfeasance & Abuse of Power
Where is the basis of our society, which should be the law ?
And where is this for the good of the country people or taxpayer ?
Glamorgan Aluminium issue (GA)
I am one of the many, many people who have been unlawfully, maliciously, vindictively persecuted, by the labour and all government, where the brief facts of my issues are as follows - Nine years to gain a hearing date on a legal issue, with the barrister pulling the plug on my legal aid the day before the hearing, on his gut feeling ? The issue was so simple, I was owed money from firms Glamorgan Aluminium (GA) £22.000 (& Frametech, formerly Turners aluminium £17,0000) firms I had been sub-contracting for, and they had also not paid any of my stopped (By them) income tax to the Inland Revenue. The issues were so simple, but the unlawful service received from all my former solicitors was not.
For several years before, Riley, Mumford, and Rausa (RMR), (Now Rausa, Mumford), were paid cash to remove a charge from my then property, they informed me they had done this, they had not ? This unlawfully left charge later came to light in regard to my sub contract business. Where I was swore at, threatened with jail and the key being thrown away for life, by solicitor Sal Rausa.
That was, until he was informed, that they were responsible for the left charge on my then property, where I was again shouted and swore at, to leave their offices. Despite my many, many requests, my files then disappeared and I was unlawfully refused requested access. These solicitors by their other negligence, caused me to pay back nearly a thousand pounds to the benefits office, which by their presence, where documented evidence lawfully presented, would clearly show I should not have owed
In trying to gain justice there followed a series of solicitors where despite their many promises, they did nothing to enhance my issues. They even gained a legal aid certificate for negligence against these initial solicitors, but all they did, was use the legal aid as an unlawful cash machine ? Of my former solicitors, Roger Riley on another issue was jailed for deception and fraud, served less than two years, and still allowed to later practice ?
Richard Fischer, was working out of the offices of Leighton Loughour & Co, who's office was later shut down and LL was struck off for fraud ? In this time a hearing was called for in the county court, and not the high court, as it should have been under the law in regard to my then home. My then home of twelve years (with well over £35.000 equity and mortgage payments nearly eighteen months in advance) was unlawfully taken away by the county court to cover up the charge that the initial solicitors (RMR) left on it ? Richard Fischer, my then acting solicitor, said he could not attend the hearing as legal aid had not been granted (which had been requested some three months earlier ?) My next solicitor, Geoff kitchen, of Keith Thomas, Pontypridd, went to court with the only three papers that RMR forwarded as a file in regard to me seeing my son. Sal Rausa said he had found my file but was not inclined to forward it as I was a liar cheat and a fraudster ? In their refusing to forward any other papers, I lost, where despite RMR having previously gained, but did not enforce, an access order, I have not seen my son in over eighteen years ?
Read More...
Evidence to Paul Ronalds Case History
Contents
• Petition Letter to Her Majesty the Queen
• Reply from Her Majesty the Queen to Petition Letter
• Petition Letter to Prime Minister Gordon Brown
• Responces from the government
• HMCS Reply
• Evidence for IPCC 1
• Evidence for IPCC 2
• Evidence for IPCC 3
• Letter to Public Service Ombudsman for Wales
• Letter to Anne Clwyd MP
• Letter to Independent Police Complaints Commission
• Letter of reason for petition
• Index of Documents: Of Claim against Government for High Court
• Letter to Audit Manager - National Audit Office
• Letter to Prime Minister
Martin Hossack - Unlawful, Vindictive and Malicious Persecution Implemented by DWP & Job Centre Plus Chief Executives
This subject to unlawful willing blindness by Judge Gary Hickinbottom
In January 2002 I became the victim of a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 by Dudley DSS (Job Centre Plus) their having provided non-relevant information about myself to a third party solicitor, namely Wragge & Co of Birmingham , employed by Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council. This concerned a compensation award to my wife over an accident which occurred on Dudley Council property. The accident had resulted from a lack of maintenance, namely a raised curb stone and was seen to have contributed to 95% of blame by Dudley Council.
Tragically this led to very dramatic consequences my wife becoming permanently disabled resulting in the loss of her career as an RGN nurse at our local hospital Russells Hall in Dudley .
THIRD PARTY SOLICITORS WRAGGE & CO
Third party solicitors Wragge & Co of Birmingham were employed by Dudley Council and within the enquiry benefit information was requested by Wragges in accordance with UK benefit regulations (having to pay back benefit that a claimant had received). In my wife's case no benefits claimed. However the DSS decided to provide information that was not relevant to the enquiry.
The DSS breached the data protection regulations of 1998 at this point and provided information about myself that was given without my permission. The consequences of this DSS transaction was critical to my wife's own case and I had to employ Waldrons solicitors to make enquiries as the act of malfeasance (abuse of power) had taken place and the DSS had provided information to Wragges solicitors that was above and beyond an acceptable level of request.
ADRIAN WITT WALDRONS SOLICITORS, BRIERLEY HILL IS EMPLOYED
Adrian Witt of Waldrons Solicitors made enquiries with Daljit Virdee the DSS manager at Dudley as to why the DSS gave information to Wragge & Co solicitors without any good reason. Daljit Virdee stated she could not substantiate the accusation and attempted to weave a web of deceit not knowing the actions that would follow. Adrian Witt then made enquiries with Wragge & Co solicitors to provide information that highlighted the 1998 data protection breach. Waldrons solicitor Adrian Witt was told by Wragges that there was no identity of officer who Wragges had spoken to. This now we know as blatant deceit. Adrian Witt contacted myself and said without Wragge & Co giving a name the chances of a successful outcome in pursuing the data protection breach was unlikely. It was at this point I was sure of the corruption and my feelings were running high in my effort to investigate and pursue the culprit concerned.
FEBRUARY 2002 WRAGGES ADMITTANCE
Wragge & Co solicitors admitted to Adrian Witt of Waldrons that information had been given to them by the DSS in Dudley . However the Solicitors denied being given any identity of a DSS officer. The DSS still denied this aspect. This being the start of a forced enquiry by myself. The Data Protection Officer, Barry Merrick who no longer is employed by the DWP/ DSS , made enquiries and makes attempts to cover up and deny that conversations took place between Wragge & Co and the DSS . But after a short while admits to speaking to officers who may well have committed the data protection breach. The situation resulted in Daljit Virdee having to highlight the officer concerned who admitted to speaking to Wragge & Co initially but denied giving information to the said solicitors. This the start of a huge conspiracy between Dudley Council, Wragge & Co and the DWP.
My solicitor at Waldrons, Adrian Witt , makes a statement that he could see no reason why Wragge & Co would be deceitful and lie. However what Adrian Witt did not take into account was the dual deceit between Wragge & Co and the DWP in an attempt to save the reputation of the DWP and the corrupt officers that were involved in this case, including Daljit Virdee 's corrupt actions.
Information gathered recently suggests Virdee's corruption was manifested by the Chief Executive for Job Centre Plus.
Adrian Witt wrote back to myself with correspondence and stated that although conversations did take place the solicitors informed him no identity of DSS officer had been given to them within the correspondence. This obviously an attempt by Wragge & Co solicitors to whitewash the situation as further on in the enquiry Wragge & Co provided information to suggest identity of officer was known all along. As you can appreciate a solicitor as big and successful as Wragge & Co you would not expect to stoop to deceit and lies. However I can clarify that I have in my possession fraudulent statements by Wragge & Co that give obscured conclusions as written above to the sequence of events that can only be viewed as cronyism between DSS , Wragge & Co and Dudley Council's finance department. Any member of the public dealing with Wragges should be concerned with the deceit portrayed by Wragge & Co solicitors of Birmingham .
I was forced into contacting the Information Commissioner for the Data Protection Act.
Read more...
Evidence to Martin Hossack Case History
Contents
• Item 1 Initial Data Protection Breach - 07/01/2002
• Item 2 Response from DSS, not able to substantiate 13/02/2002
• Item 3 Barry Merrick Data Protection officer denial - 22/03/2002
• Item 4 Spurious letter from Barry Merrick 22/02/2002
• Item 5 Letter from data protection unit, Keith Reeder 03/04/2002
• Item 5 Letter from data protection unit, Keith Reeder 03/04/2002 (Part 2)
• Item 6 Letter from Adrian Witt Solicitor for Waldron's 23/04/2002
• Item 7 Letter from Andrew Frost initial enquiry 22/10/2002
• Item 7 Letter from Andrew Frost initial enquiry 22/10/2002 (Part 2)
• Item 8 - Letter to Virdee DSS (DWP) Manager 29/10/2002
• Item 9 Letter from A. Frost Job Centre Plus 02/12/2002
• Item 10 Wragge & Co Spurious & unlawful 29/03/2004
• Item 10 Wragge & Co Spurious & unlawful 29/03/2004 (Part 2)
• Item 11 Office of the solicitor spurious 14/03/2003
• Item 11 Office of the solicitor spurious 14/03/2003 (Part 2)
• Item 12 A. Frost Job Centre Plus Malfeasance 08/01/2003
• Item 13 Government ombudsman report 24/04/2004
• Item 13 Government ombudsman report 24/04/2004 (Part 2)
• Item 13 Government ombudsman report 24/04/2004 (Part 3)
• Item 14 Rosemary Thew malicious collaboration 17/11/2004
• Item 14 Rosemary Thew malicious collaboration 17/11/2004 (Part 2)
• Item 14 Rosemary Thew malicious collaboration 17/11/2004 (Part 3)
• Item 14 Rosemary Thew malicious collaboration 17/11/2004 (Part 4)
• Item 15 Information Commissioner deceit 13/02/2004
• Item 15 Information Commissioner deceit 13/02/2004 (Part 2)
• Item 16 Rosemary Thew deceit & collaboration 15/10/2004
• Item 16 Rosemary Thew deceit & collaboration 15/10/2004 (Part 2)
• Item 16 Rosemary Thew deceit & collaboration 15/10/2004 (Part 3)
• Item 16 Rosemary Thew deceit & collaboration 15/10/2004 (Part 4)
• Item 17 Ombudsman Report first admittance 02/02/2005
• Item 17 Ombudsman Report first admittance 02/02/2005 (Part 2)
• Item 17 Ombudsman Report first admittance 02/02/2005 (Part 3)
• Item 17 Ombudsman Report first admittance 02/02/2005 (Part 4)
• Item 17 Ombudsman Report first admittance 02/02/2005 (Part 5)
• Item 18 Letter from MP - Conspiracy 11/02/2005
• Item 18B Letter to minister of state requesting costs 12/02/2005
• Item 19 My solicitor Putsmans Clarification 21/09/2005
• Item 19 My solicitor Putsmans Clarification 21/09/2005 (Part 2)
• Item 20 Info regarding data protection act- 21/03/2005
• Item 21 Putsmans instruction to council 24/06/2005
• Item 21 Putsmans instruction to council 24/06/2005 (Part 2)
• Item 21 Putsmans instruction to council 24/06/2005 (Part 3)
• Item 21 Putsmans instruction to council 24/06/2005 (Part 4)
• Item 21 Putsmans instruction to council 24/06/2005 (Part 5)
• Item 22 Letter from JCP Margaret Tovey 19/10/2006
• Item 22 Letter from JCP Margaret Tovey 19/10/2006 (Part 2)
• Item 22 Letter from JCP Margaret Tovey 19/10/2006 (Part 3)
• Item 23 ADR resolution request 04/09/2006
• Item 24 letter from minister of state (inadvertent) 10/03/2005
• Item 24 letter from minister of state (inadvertent) 10/03/2005 (Part 2)
• Item 25 Waldron's Spurious Findings 19/07/2002
• Item 26 Letter JCP(Job Centre Plus) requesting answers -06/02/2005
• Outcome of Mr Hossack v Information Commissioner
29/11/2007 - DWP Buckle Under Strain
Since our last update some time ago my own personal case has had a break through that I can only describe as positive as evidence and information can now be 100% clarified as being a huge conspiracy against my-self and information put forward by Shirley Hollingsworth being a spokesman and manager of the DWP has personally made a statement admitting that the DWP did encourage deceit, corruption and fraud as the identity of the officer who committed the breach was known since 2001 and that malfeasance being abuse of power against a member of the public being my-self was the theme the DWP chose to pursue. This matter has now been put in the hands of our MP Ian Pearson for Dudley South and I await a response. The letter can be viewed that I have sent to him in form of email on this site under news and updates.
To view the Shirley Hollingsworth Report please see our Name and Shame page for more updates on corrupt activities within the DWP and job centre plus.
Monica's Case - Corruption, Nazism at the Jobcentre Plus (DWP) and the Tribunals and Courts!
This is another detailed case of exposure of common purpose; the detailed document exposes unlawful, vindictive, malicious persecution against yet another member of the public. It is clarified in this document, the theme, once again of implemented actions have been unlawful willing blindness against a member of the public, we are pleased that people like Maurice are coming forward and having their stories put on site for exposure, which is the only way to combat common purpose and the scum involved.
I was unfairly dismissed therefore I had no alternative but apply for Jobseeker allowance.
I realised that I have not received payment. The JSA was ceased unlawfully without any reason, decision, etc.
On 24 September 2007 when I went to the Jobcentre to sign on I have asked information and help regarding the stopped JSA.
The answer was, they kicked me out from the building when I asked why I did not receive payment and I clearly stated I record the conversation but of course the Nazi insects did not sort the matter out!
The Appeal Tribunal was also extremely corrupt, disgusting and primitive! The chairman is fluently lie in his Judgment to manipulate the further proceeding and clearly slandered me. The Nazi pig perverting the course of Justice
The full hearing will be available soon so everyone can hear how corrupt assholes playing with the taxpayers' life and wasting the taxpayers' money!!!
The full documentation will also available soon which clearly underpin the corruption. The Jobcentre fraudulently has spirited the evidences off from my appeal!
I lodged a Claim against the Jobcentre on the Newcastle upon Tyne County but the Nazi Corrupt Criminals has spirited the evidences and documentation away from the Court file to give unlawful preference for his protégé the DWP.
Read More...
Evidence to Monica's Case History
Nazism and corruption at the Jobcentre! Incident on 24.09.2007 (Part 1) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSOkaHAqXK4
Nazism and corruption at the Jobcentre! Incident on 24.09.2007 (Part 2) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bF6yTO5BFYw
The Racist under qualified Clerk of the Racist Judge who has dreamed the Law - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frQgzbrubT0
Corruption 1.1 (stolen doc. from the court) 13-02-2008 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN2nxIjlua0
Corruption 1.2 (stolen doc. from the court) 13-02-2008 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwKioI1XdPI
Corruption 2 (stolen doc. from the court) 14-02-2008 - http://www.youtube..com/watch?v=P-ZAEM2kl9E
Corruption 3 (stolen doc. from the court) 15-02-2008 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diTJBrNT46k
Corrupt Judges and Court office rs A. Adams (part 1) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2pkIIbLLdM
Corrupt Judges and Court office rs A. Adams (part 2) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNIgbDrUcKs
These are large files so please be patient! - Evidence File 1 - Evidence File 2 - Evidence File 3
John Jones - Malfeasance & Abuse of Power pertaining to Unlawful willing blindness and as a member of the public they have been subjected to unlawful, vindictive, malicious persecution at the hands of Common Purpose. Explained by our client experience of swivel serpents suppression.
In finding the below hardships in my own lifetime, and from looking around at what is happening in my childhood area, I would like to ask those who supposedly act on our behalf, and in the best interest of the country ? What has changed for the better ?
1960 - Born
1964 - Father dies mother been a widow ever since and I am the only child
1966 - First epileptic convulsion nothing serious
1970 - Moved to the Bridgend area of South Wales
1970 1972 - I started to really excel in maths, sometimes confounding my own tutors at Cornelly junior school.
1972 - Although subjected to a lot of bullying, we were also not very well off, but I was young and used my own intuition to come up with ideas to help me progress and forget. Where I was now able to understand some maths to A level standard
Read More...
NOTE: Video evidence will be avaliable for viewing shortly.
Maurice Kellett Case History - Exposure of Common Purpose
This is another detailed case of exposure of common purpose; the detailed document exposes unlawful, vindictive, malicious pe rs ecution against yet another member of the public. It is clarified in this document, the theme, once again of implemented actions have been unlawful willing blindness against a member of the public, we are pleased that people like Maurice are coming forward and having their stories put on site for exposure, which is the only way to combat common purpose and the scum involved.
Read More...
Catherine's Case History -
Malfeance Monsters CAFCASS CORAM Partnership
'This is another concerning case pertaining to the secret family courts that have now been clarified to be full of corrupt judicial civil servants that are put in our adopted children into vulnerable situations and as clarified within the following documents. Individuals in pubic are suffering unlawfully, vindictive, malicious persecution at the hands of the corrupt government. This is just 1 case in hundreds that has evidence of a spurious nature that has turned the atrocity into a money making partnership. We suggest you keep a close eye on this article as many more are to follow and result in complete exposure will be imminent.'
Martin - DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK
I respectfully submit my finding's regarding the CAFCASS CORAM Partnership.
CAFCASS are required by Law to be independent of all childcare related organisations and legal institutions.
Their sole purpose - to ensure that the child's interests are held paramount at all times.
Their latest published annual returns acknowledge payments from government in excess of
£104 million. Willingly paid by the UK public with the assurance that CAFCASS will always maintain the principal of in "The Best Interest of The Children"
The UK public's current perception of CAFCASS, due to their performance, stats, in addition to the latest OFSTED report, is at an all time low. The would prefer them
replaced with the assurance of the new organisation retaining the primary objective
of their very existence "Ensuring and Safeguarding Our Children's Future".
CAFCASS joined in partnership on April 4th 2008 by Coram a registered charity,
(Annual turnover in (2005-2006) of 18 million).
No mention has been made available regarding Coram's background.
Read More...
Dead Beat Dads set to take on the CSA - Published Date: 16 June 2008 By Paul Marsden
A big thank you to Maurice Barnett for providing dwpcorruption.co.uk with further evidence of unlawful vindictive malicious persecution towards members of the public. This being the same theme as families and members of the public being persecuted in the secret family courts where we have now been provided with evidence to substantiate facts of child trafficking and selling children for monetary gain, in it's an unlawful willing blindness.
A THORNTON dad-of-three has launched a support group to help fathers who are battling with the Child Support Agency. Train driver Maurice Barnett, 37, has started the Dead Beat Dads association in a bid to put pressure on agency bosses.
What do you think about the Dead Beat Dads plan? Leave comments below.
He claims the CSA's tactics when collecting payments leave fathers out of pocket, depressed and unable to see their children.
The fledgling group, which already has 10 members, is planning protests against the CSA's handling of fathers' affairs.
Mr Barnett, of Fleetwood Road South, has accused the agency of "degrading fathers" by "robbing them of their money" and dignity and said his experience of the system left him suffering from depression and set to have his former family home repossessed.
He said: "We want a fairer system set-up.
"Any man's rights have been completely eroded away. You could pay your ex-wife cash-in-hand for six years, fall out and she can contact the CSA who demand you pay it all again.
"When they get involved, fathers are losing contact with their children.
"Fathers are moving out of the home, paying for their children and then being told their bedsit isn't appropriate or they can't afford to pick up their children."
Protests planned by the group are expected to be less eye-catching than fellow fathers' group, Fathers 4 Justice, but aimed at meeting influential figures to change CSA policies.
High profile stunts by Fathers 4 Justice have included flour bombing former prime minister Tony Blair and last weekend climbing on to the roof of Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman's house dressed as superheroes.
The Dead Beat Dads has been co-founded by Mr Barnett's partner Sherri-Lee Barnett, 39, who is training to be a councillor.
She said: "MPs up and down the country are being bombarded with calls for help from fathers.
"We hear the CSA are asking non-resident fathers what is the limit on your credit card? Can you remortgage your house? Just to get people to settle their arrears.
"They are telling people they shouldn't have had a second family."
But a spokesman for the Department of Work and Pensions defended the CSA's record.
He said: "Every parent has a financial responsibility for their child.
"We look at each case individually to ensure the correct maintenance assessment is made.
"This isn't about securing money for the CSA but about recovering money for those children who are owed it."
Anyone wanting to get in contact with Mr Barnett can ring him on 07523 936072 or visit www.deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk
